Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By Melanie M. Ghaw, Esq. and Rachel H. Khedouri, Esq.

In a case of first impression, a New Jersey District Court has determined there is no implied private cause of action under the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory, Enforcement Assistance, and Marketplace Modernization Act (“CREAMMA”), the statute legalizing recreational cannabis use for adults. In other words, only the state’s Cannabis Regulatory Commission – and not private citizens – has the authority to sue under the statute to enforce CREAMMA. As a reminder, CREAMMA prohibits employers from testing for cannabis except under certain circumstances or taking adverse employment actions based on an applicant’s or employee’s off-duty cannabis use. For additional information regarding CREAMMA, please refer to our February 2021 and September 2022 eAlerts, available HERE and HERE.

In Zanetich v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-05387 (D.N.J. May 25, 2023), the Plaintiff applied for a job in a New Jersey-based Walmart’s Asset Protection Department. After interviewing with Walmart, the Plaintiff received a conditional job offer subject to taking and passing a drug test in accordance with Walmart’s Drug & Alcohol Policy. 

Shortly thereafter, Walmart informed Plaintiff that his job offer was rescinded because he had tested positive for cannabis. The Plaintiff filed a class action asserting, in part, that Walmart violated CREAMMA by rescinding his job offer. U.S. District Judge Christine P. O’Hearn agreed with the Defendants’ argument that individuals do not have the authority to sue under CREAMMA and dismissed the litigation. 

While Judge O’Hearn determined there is no evidence the Legislature intended to create a private cause of action under the statute, she also noted that the express language of the statute is “less than helpful,” wherein it explicitly prohibits employers from taking certain adverse actions but does not state how or by whom the provision would be enforced, and what, if any, remedies would be available. Judge O’Hearn further noted that, while the court’s decision effectively leaves Plaintiff without a remedy, it is up to lawmakers, not judges, to fix the statutory scheme.

Employer Takeaway

Although the court’s decision may provide some relief for employers, it is likely to be temporary as the Plaintiff has already filed a Notice of Appeal for consideration of this issue at a higher judicial level and Judge O’Hearn expressly invited the Legislature to consider amending the statute to provide a remedy for aggrieved individuals. Accordingly, employers should continue to proceed with caution when taking any adverse action based on an applicant’s or employee’s recreational cannabis use.  

NFC’s attorneys can assist employers in navigating the evolving laws regarding recreational cannabis use. If you need assistance drafting or reviewing a drug-free workplace policy or drug testing protocol, or have any questions on how best to address any workplace cannabis issues, please contact the NFC Attorney with whom you typically work or call us at 973.665.9100.


SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.

"*" indicates required fields

By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.