ATTENTION EMPLOYERS: FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT ISSUES NARROW ORDER LIMITING ENFORCEMENT OF TERMINATION AND CERTIFICATION PROVISIONS IN DEI-RELATED EXECUTIVE ORDERS

On March 27, 2025, in Chicago Women in Trades v. Trump et al., U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Kennelly of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued a narrow temporary restraining order (TRO) limiting enforcement of the Certification Provision in Executive Order 14173 (Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity) and the Termination Provision in Executive Order 14151 (Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferences). 

The ruling comes just two weeks after the Fourth Circuit granted the government’s motion to stay a nationwide injunction blocking enforcement of the same provisions in addition to parts of the Enforcement Threat Provision in Executive Order 14173 (see HERE).  

Background

In Chicago Women in Trades v. Trump et al., the plaintiff challenged Executive Orders 14151 and 14173 as unconstitutionally vague in violation of the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and, additionally, that the Executive Orders unconstitutionally condition federal funds on an agreement not to engage in protected speech. 

Executive Orders Likely Violate First Amendment Rights

The court ruled that the plaintiff “established a likelihood of success on its claims that the Termination and Certification Provisions violate its First Amendment rights.” Among other things, Judge Kennelly found the Termination Provision is likely a “coercive threat[,]” and the provision’s vagueness gives rise to First Amendment issues; and the Certification Provision puts plaintiff and other grantees in a “difficult and perhaps impossible position” to eliminate “illegal DEI programs” without guidance on what constitutes “illegal DEI.” 

Judge Kennelly also found the plaintiff established a “sufficiently imminent injury” by showing it received “credible threats of enforcement” and “had one of its subcontracts terminated due to the Executive Orders.” Accordingly, Judge Kennelly ruled that a TRO would be necessary to prevent “irreparable harm that would result from enforcement of the provisions.”  Judge Kennelly, however, limited the scope of the TRO only to actions by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).

Scope of the Temporary Restraining Order

Pursuant to the ruling, the scope of the TRO applies as follows:

  • Certification Provision: Enforcement blocked nationwide for all DOL grant recipients.
  • Termination Provision: Enforcement blocked only for the plaintiff and any federal grantee through which plaintiff holds a subcontract or is a subrecipient of federal funds. 

Employer Takeaways

A hearing to extend the TRO is scheduled for April 10, 2025, at which time, the court may issue a broader injunction. In the meantime:

  • DOL grant recipients will not be required to certify that they (1) are in compliance with all applicable federal anti-discrimination laws for False Claims Act purposes, and (2) do not operate any programs “promoting DEI” that violate any applicable federal anti-discrimination laws.
  • The Termination Provision is still in effect, which requires federal agencies to terminate all “equity-related grants or contracts.” 

As we previously reported HERE, there are several pending lawsuits that challenge the DEI-related Executive Orders.  We anticipate conflicting rulings in the weeks and months ahead and expect that the Supreme Court will eventually need to rule about the constitutionality of the Executive Orders.  We will continue to keep you posted on these developments.   


SIGN UP

SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.

"*" indicates required fields

By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.