BRINGING COVID-19 FROM THE WORKPLACE TO THE HOME: CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT TO WEIGH IN ON EMPLOYER’S OBLIGATIONS, IF ANY, TO SAFEGUARD THEIR EMPLOYEES’ HOUSEHOLD

By Iman A. Wells, Esq. On April 21, 2022, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion, Kuciemba v. Victory Woodworks, Inc., certifying two important questions for the California Supreme Court.  Specifically, the Ninth Circuit has tasked the California Supreme Court to opine on: (1) whether California’s derivative injury doctrine bars a spouse’s claim against an employer, […]

Line in the Sand: District Court Untangles Boundaries of Legal Advice, Attorneys’ Role in Employee’s Termination Decision

by Erica M. Clifford, Esq. The District Court of New Jersey recently weighed in on a thorny discovery dispute, deciding whether written communications exchanged with County Counsel and outside litigation counsel could be subject to discovery in a litigation despite the assertion of attorney/client privilege. In Graham v. Monmouth County Buildings and Grounds, Magistrate Judge […]

Following Congress Passing Bipartisan Arbitration Limitation, New Jersey Appellate Division Rules that NJLAD Prohibition on Arbitration is Preempted by the FAA

By Lindsey Andreozzi, Esq. This month brought significant changes for employment arbitration, as both Congress and the New Jersey Appellate Division took significant actions that could disrupt the common practice of arbitration in the employment arena. On February 10, 2022, both houses of Congress approved a bill entitled Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and […]

The New York Division of Human Rights Announces It Will Discontinue Private Settlements

By Jean Schroll, Esq. On October 1, 2021, the New York State Division of Human Rights (the “Division”) announced that, for all complaints filed on or after October 12, 2021, it will no longer issue Commissioner’s Orders discontinuing complaints after private settlement.  This is a significant change because, as the Division notes, “nearly half of […]

Third Circuit Holds “Comparable” Paid Leave Available to Servicemembers As A Right And Benefit Pursuant to USERRA

By Kristine Ryan, Esq. The Uniform Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (“USERRA”), one of several statutes benefitting veterans, prohibits civilian employers from discriminating against employees because of their military status.  USERRA does not require an employer to offer paid military leave of absence.  However, in a recent precedential decision, the Third Circuit […]

What is Garden Variety Emotional Distress Anyway? Understanding When a Plaintiff Places His or Her Physical or Mental Health at Issue in the Context of an Employment Litigation.

By Kegan Andeskie, Esq. It is generally accepted that a plaintiff who files a lawsuit places his or her mental and physical health in controversy by claiming emotional distress or physical damages, but at what point can a court require that litigant to produce or authorize the release of otherwise confidential medical records, or submit […]

NJ HIGH COURT CONFIRMS THE IMPORTANCE OF IDENTIFYING THE SPECIFIC CEPA PROVISION(S) UPON WHICH AN EMPLOYEE RELIES DURING THE COURSE OF LITIGATION. 

By Punam Alam, Esq., June 3, 2021 In a split opinion, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled on May 21, 2021 that the trial court must re-evaluate an employee’s whistleblower claim because the plaintiff-employee did not articulate which statutory provision of CEPA she was relying on in summary judgment proceedings before the trial court. The case […]

Over 2,000 COVID-19 Related Lawsuits Filed in United States

Earlier this month, it was reported that the total number of COVID-19 related employment complaints filed in United States courts passed the 2,000 mark.  In fact, December 2020 through March 2021 have realized the most activity since the beginning of the pandemic. States with the greatest number of complaints filed are California (487), New Jersey […]

SIGN UP

SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.