At this point, it is likely that most (if not all) employment law specialists are familiar with SCOTUS’ landmark ruling in Ames v. Ohio
In Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, Inc., the California Supreme Court held that an illegible arbitration agreement does not automatically invalidate the agreement. The Court
On April 23, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14281, Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy, which seeks to “eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability
On June 5, 2025, in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services (No. 23-1039), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that “majority group” plaintiffs are not required
Following up on our timelines documenting DEI-related events impacting the private sector, this fifth installment discusses new developments, including new cases and case updates,
On May 21, 2025, in State of Louisiana, et al. v. EEOC, U.S. District Judge David C. Joseph ofthe U.S. District Court for the
On May 15, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued an order vacating portions of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
On May 1, 2025, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a field assistance bulletin announcing it will no longer apply the 2024 Biden-era
NJ Appellate Division Issues Latest Pro-Arbitration Ruling Requiring Former Re/Max Agent to Arbitrate Sexual Harassment Claims Brought under LAD By Lindsey Andreozzi, Esq., February
New Union, New Agreement: The Third Circuit holds original CBAs with prior labor union invalid in Utility Workers United Association, Local 537 v. Pennsylvania
COVID-19 Employment Lawsuits Climbing the Courts: Second Circuit to Hear Previously Dismissed Public Nuisance and Workplace Safety Claims Against Amazon. By Jesse Grasty, Esq.,
Third Circuit Holds That Good Faith Bargaining Requires Production of Presumptively Relevant Information, Not A Concession To Overbroad Requests By Kristine V. Ryan,
NJ Supreme Court Slims Down the Requirements for Enforceable Arbitration Agreements By Nivritha Ketty, Esq., September 15, 2020 In a unanimous ruling last week,
YOU’VE GOT MAIL! NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT ISSUES KEY RULING UPHOLDING THE USE OF ELECTRONIC ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN THE EMPLOYMENT CONTEXT By Iman Wells,
An employer’s guide to preparing for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) CHATHAM, NJ – March 10, 2020 Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC Employment Attorneys (NFC),
NFC Introduces new dedicated practice Group designed to handle Restrictive Covenant matters CHATHAM, NJ – January 13, 2020 Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC Employment Attorneys
Neighbor News SAGE Announces New Board Members Two new Trustees join SAGE By Cindy Potters, Neighbor Mar 5, 2020 1:21 pm ET SUMMIT, NJ –
Kerrie R. Heslin, Partner at Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, named to NAMWOLF board CHATHAM, NJ – January 6, 2020 Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC Employment Attorneys
SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.