EDIT: We previously reported on a phased in reduction of the employer threshold scheduled for 2027 and 2028. We are republishing this e-alert to clarify that
In 2025, we published a series of timelines documenting key developments in the fast-shifting and polarizing DEI landscape. This DEI Legal Developments Spotlight continues where
New Jersey Appellate Division Broadly Applies Ending Forced Arbitration Act In this consolidated appeal, the New Jersey Appellate Division held in McDermott v. Guaranteed
UPDATE: On February 13, 2026, Governor Hochul signed into law A9452 enacting chapter amendments to NY’s Trapped at Work Act. Among other things, the
EDIT: This article references a phased in reduction of the employer threshold scheduled for 2027 and 2028. The law as enacted will only reduce
On March 27, 2025, in Chicago Women in Trades v. Trump et al., U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Kennelly of the U.S. District Court for
As the anniversary of California’s workplace violence prevention law approaches, so too does the deadline to comply with the law’s annual policy review and training requirements. As
UPDATE: On March 27, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (Addressing Risks from WilmerHale) accusing the firm of “abandon[ing] the profession’s highest ideals
California employers will no longer have to wait until harassment escalates into unlawful violence or a credible threat of violence to protect their employees. Thanks
On March 19, 2025, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued two technical assistance documents providing guidance on unlawful discrimination related to diversity,
UPDATE: In a March 18 letter addressed to EEOC Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, seven former EEOC officials urged Lucas to withdraw the 20 letters
Third Circuit Holds That Good Faith Bargaining Requires Production of Presumptively Relevant Information, Not A Concession To Overbroad Requests By Kristine V. Ryan,
NJ Supreme Court Slims Down the Requirements for Enforceable Arbitration Agreements By Nivritha Ketty, Esq., September 15, 2020 In a unanimous ruling last week,
YOU’VE GOT MAIL! NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT ISSUES KEY RULING UPHOLDING THE USE OF ELECTRONIC ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN THE EMPLOYMENT CONTEXT By Iman Wells,
Collazo v. Prime Flight of DE, Inc.: The DNJ Rules That Explicit Jury Waivers Are Not Needed To Enforce Arbitration Agreements in the Employment Context
Oh Snap! The District Court of New Jersey Determines Post Removal Service of Non-Diverse Defendant Does Not Divest Subject Matter Jurisdiction By Kristine Ryan,
New Jersey Supreme Court Issues Latest Pro-Arbitration Ruling Requiring Delivery Drivers in New Jersey To Arbitrate Dispute With Employer Despite Federal Exemption By Iman
co-authored by Christine Gottesman, Esq., Special Counsel at Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C. in Chatham and Kelly Deere, Assistant Clinical Professor of Law at Rutgers
Employer Arbitration Agreement Pointers From 2 Rulings By Kirsten Grossman (October 13, 2020) published as a Guest Article by Law360 Expert Analysis On Sept.
CHATHAM, NJ (October 1, 2020) – Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (NFC), a top-ranked Employment Law Firm representing management, announced today their expansion to the
RETIREMENT PLAN ERISA FIDUCIARY DUTIES DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS This article appeared on https://westminster-consulting.com/Media/Confero/Issue31/ on July 14, 2020. Link to see this article
This article appeared on the Westlaw Practitioner Insights Commentaries web page on July 2, 2020. Please sign into your account to view this
CHATHAM, NJ – June 15, 2020 – Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (NFC), a top-ranked Employment Law Firm representing management, is pleased to announce that
SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.