Shortly after the January 2025 inauguration, the government embarked on a sweeping campaign to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the public
New Jersey employers feeling left out this holiday season? Well, you must have been good because – just in the jolly ‘ol Saint Nick of
While it may have been a relatively silent night for employers in 2025, Albany’s legislative elves toiled away to gift employers with plenty of
On November 17, 2025, the Southern District of New York held in Mera v. SA Hospitality Group, LLC, et al., 23 civ. 3492 (PGG)(SDA)
On November 19, 2025, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced updated materials, reinforcing its commitment to “advancing robust enforcement and awareness around
A recent New Jersey District Court decision serves as a sharp reminder that job titles and pay structures alone don’t determine exemption status. An
UPDATE: New York City’s Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (“DCWP”) has published its “Workers’ Bill of Rights” webpage (HERE), providing an overview of
On December 22, 2023, New York Governor Kathy Hochul vetoed Senate Bill S3100A, which broadly prohibited employee non-compete agreements. As discussed in more detail HERE
UPDATE – On December 22, 2023, Governor Hochul vetoed Bill S3100A. For more information, see our eAlert HERE. Once again this year, legislators in
While the rest of us were shopping and baking in preparation for our holiday feasts, the New York Legislature was busy cooking up some
While California’s legislative session may have just ended, employer obligations under several new laws are just beginning. This top ten roundup of recently enacted workplace
On October 4, 2023, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 616, which amends California’s existing paid sick leave law to increase the amount
By Allison Vogel, Esq., April 20, 2021 It is well-settled that a defendant may not remove a case to federal court based upon diversity
By Ryan Carlson, Esq., April 15, 2021 Most arbitration agreements identify the specific arbitration forum where an employee must bring a dispute. The Judicial
NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT PERMITS PLAINTIFF TO SEEK RELIANCE DAMAGES UNDER THE THEORY OF PROMMISSORY ESTOPPEL FOR A RESCINDED JOB OFFER. By Allison J.
NJ Appellate Division Issues Latest Pro-Arbitration Ruling Requiring Former Re/Max Agent to Arbitrate Sexual Harassment Claims Brought under LAD By Lindsey Andreozzi, Esq., February
New Union, New Agreement: The Third Circuit holds original CBAs with prior labor union invalid in Utility Workers United Association, Local 537 v. Pennsylvania
COVID-19 Employment Lawsuits Climbing the Courts: Second Circuit to Hear Previously Dismissed Public Nuisance and Workplace Safety Claims Against Amazon. By Jesse Grasty, Esq.,
SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.