In our installments of the timeline documenting DEI-related events impacting the private sector, we have been rounding up the latest developments including some public
On August 25, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed that the EEOC may continue investigating and enforcing subpoenas even
On September 5, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) finally put an end to its efforts to defend the agency’s Final Non-Compete Rule –
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contacts: Karen Korrfor Nukk-Freeman & Cerra karen@fullkorrpress.com(619) 944-0650 (cell) Chris Siscocsisco@nfclegal.com (973) 507- 7638 (direct) NUKK-FREEMAN & CERRA, P.C. EXPANDS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contacts: Karen Korr for Nukk-Freeman & Cerra karen@fullkorrpress.com (619) 944-0650 (cell) Chris Sisco csisco@nfclegal.com (973) 507-7638 (direct) SAN DIEGO (September
The Third Circuit’s recent decision holds that workplace rumors rooted in gender stereotypes can constitute unlawful harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights
On January 26, 2022, new and dramatically expanded protections go into effect for employees in New York who report employer actions they believe to
The New York Commissioner of Health has extended New York State’s indoor mask mandate. As previously reported in NFC’s December 16, 2021 e-Alert, any indoor
On January 13, 2022, the Supreme Court issued decisions affecting two federal vaccine mandates: What does this mean for the ETS? The Sixth Circuit
On January 13, 2022, the Supreme Court issued decisions affecting two federal vaccine mandates: What does this mean for the ETS? The Sixth Circuit
Here we go again…On January 5, 2022, the California Department of Public Health (“CDPH”) updated its “Guidance for Local Health Jurisdictions on Isolation and
As we all are getting ready to close the books on 2021, employers should be aware of new developments from the CDC, OSHA and
Third Circuit Holds That Good Faith Bargaining Requires Production of Presumptively Relevant Information, Not A Concession To Overbroad Requests By Kristine V. Ryan,
NJ Supreme Court Slims Down the Requirements for Enforceable Arbitration Agreements By Nivritha Ketty, Esq., September 15, 2020 In a unanimous ruling last week,
YOU’VE GOT MAIL! NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT ISSUES KEY RULING UPHOLDING THE USE OF ELECTRONIC ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN THE EMPLOYMENT CONTEXT By Iman Wells,
Collazo v. Prime Flight of DE, Inc.: The DNJ Rules That Explicit Jury Waivers Are Not Needed To Enforce Arbitration Agreements in the Employment Context
Oh Snap! The District Court of New Jersey Determines Post Removal Service of Non-Diverse Defendant Does Not Divest Subject Matter Jurisdiction By Kristine Ryan,
New Jersey Supreme Court Issues Latest Pro-Arbitration Ruling Requiring Delivery Drivers in New Jersey To Arbitrate Dispute With Employer Despite Federal Exemption By Iman
SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.