On February 26, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a proposed rule for determining employee or independent contractor status under the Fair
On February 6, 2026, the Labor and Workforce Development Agency (LWDA) released proposed regulations to implement changes under the 2024 Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) reform. Among
On February 26, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued its Final Rule for determining joint-employer status under the National Labor Relations Act.
At this point, it is likely that most (if not all) employment law specialists are familiar with SCOTUS’ landmark ruling in Ames v. Ohio
On July 25, 2024, in Okonowsky v. Garland, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that harassing conduct that occurs outside
Following on the heels of the Federal Trade Commission’s fouled effort to ban employment-related non-competition agreements nationwide (see our prior eAlerts on the status
It’s that spooky time of year again for California employers – Governor Newsom has spoken but, fear not, we have narrowed it down. Whether you’re
On September 29, Governor Newsom signed into law AB2499, enacting a sweeping set of changes to California’s “jury, court, and victim time off” law,
. . . and employers may be held liable. On July 29, 2024, in Bailey v. San Francisco District Attorney’s Office (2024) 16 Cal.5th
This Fall, the most significant fashion update comes not from the runways of New York Fashion Week, but courtesy of New Jersey’s Office of
Third Circuit Holds That Good Faith Bargaining Requires Production of Presumptively Relevant Information, Not A Concession To Overbroad Requests By Kristine V. Ryan,
NJ Supreme Court Slims Down the Requirements for Enforceable Arbitration Agreements By Nivritha Ketty, Esq., September 15, 2020 In a unanimous ruling last week,
YOU’VE GOT MAIL! NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT ISSUES KEY RULING UPHOLDING THE USE OF ELECTRONIC ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN THE EMPLOYMENT CONTEXT By Iman Wells,
Collazo v. Prime Flight of DE, Inc.: The DNJ Rules That Explicit Jury Waivers Are Not Needed To Enforce Arbitration Agreements in the Employment Context
Oh Snap! The District Court of New Jersey Determines Post Removal Service of Non-Diverse Defendant Does Not Divest Subject Matter Jurisdiction By Kristine Ryan,
New Jersey Supreme Court Issues Latest Pro-Arbitration Ruling Requiring Delivery Drivers in New Jersey To Arbitrate Dispute With Employer Despite Federal Exemption By Iman
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACTChris Sisco (she/her/hers)Director of Marketing & Business Development Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C. (973) 507-7638CSisco@nfclegal.com Eric W. Hughes (he/him/his)Bershad Director of CommunicationsVolunteer
CHATHAM, NEW JERSEY (January 3, 2024): Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (NFC) a top-ranked employment law firm representing management is pleased to announce the promotion
SAN DIEGO (November 30 2023): Employment law firm Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (NFC) is proud to welcome Michael J. Morphew as Counsel supporting the
SAN DIEGO (August 7, 2023): Attorney Stacy L. Fode, Managing Partner of Nukk-Freeman & Cerra,PC (NFC)’s West Coast office, has been named as the
Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C. Partners, Kerrie Heslin and Robin Rome have each been recognized as a 2023 Thomson Reuters® Stand-out Lawyer. Each year, Thomson
NFC is pleased to announce that the Firm has been recognized by Chambers USA 2023 for excellence in labor and employment law, and five
SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.