On March 28, 2025, the New Jersey Appellate Court (“Court”) affirmed the motion judge’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants in
If you’ve been tracking DEI-related events in the private sector, you know a lot has happened since we first published our timeline on March
If you haven’t updated your employment contracts and settlement agreements in light of the New Jersey Supreme Court’s May 2024 Savage v. Township of Neptune decision,
On March 27, 2025, in Chicago Women in Trades v. Trump et al., U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Kennelly of the U.S. District Court for
On March 17, 2025, the New Jersey Supreme Court (in a unanimous decision) held that “commissions” are considered “wages” and protected under the New
As the anniversary of California’s workplace violence prevention law approaches, so too does the deadline to comply with the law’s annual policy review and training requirements. As
This year, legislators in New York and New Jersey and federal government agencies were busy enacting new legislation and issuing guidance affecting the employer-employee
In recognition of recent technological advances – and the resulting increase in worker monitoring, tracking, and assessment through third-party companies – the Consumer Financial
The New York State Department of Labor (“DOL”) published FAQs to provide clarity on its interpretation of the state’s paid prenatal leave law which
In early November, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued a pair of decisions that reverse decades of precedent and establish new standards to
The U.S. Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) final rule raising exemption salary thresholds under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) has been vacated with nationwide
The OFCCP has extended the deadline for companies to object to the FOIA requests to December 10, 2024. The Office of Federal Contract Compliance
COVID-19 Employment Lawsuits Climbing the Courts: Second Circuit to Hear Previously Dismissed Public Nuisance and Workplace Safety Claims Against Amazon. By Jesse Grasty, Esq.,
Third Circuit Holds That Good Faith Bargaining Requires Production of Presumptively Relevant Information, Not A Concession To Overbroad Requests By Kristine V. Ryan,
NJ Supreme Court Slims Down the Requirements for Enforceable Arbitration Agreements By Nivritha Ketty, Esq., September 15, 2020 In a unanimous ruling last week,
YOU’VE GOT MAIL! NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT ISSUES KEY RULING UPHOLDING THE USE OF ELECTRONIC ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN THE EMPLOYMENT CONTEXT By Iman Wells,
Collazo v. Prime Flight of DE, Inc.: The DNJ Rules That Explicit Jury Waivers Are Not Needed To Enforce Arbitration Agreements in the Employment Context
Oh Snap! The District Court of New Jersey Determines Post Removal Service of Non-Diverse Defendant Does Not Divest Subject Matter Jurisdiction By Kristine Ryan,
SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.