In Cano v. County Concrete Corp., No. A-0056-24 (App. Div. Jan. 28, 2026), the New Jersey Appellate Division issued its first published decision interpreting
Effective as of April 18, 2026, S3072—signed into law December 2025—amends the New York Fair Credit Reporting Act to prohibit employers from requesting or
In a time defined by technology, even the most routine legal practices demand heightened care. The once straightforward act of sending settlement funds to
This installment of DEI Legal Developments Spotlight continues our discussion of recent DEI-related updates impacting the private sector and public sector developments that may
On February 26, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a proposed rule for determining employee or independent contractor status under the Fair
On June 27, 2025, in Trump, et al. v. CASA, Inc., et al., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal district courts likely do not
In April 2024, a Texas federal court blocked the Federal Trade Commission from enforcing its final rule banning new non-compete agreements with nearly all
On April 23, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14281, Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy, which seeks to “eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability
On June 5, 2025, in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services (No. 23-1039), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that “majority group” plaintiffs are not required
Following up on our timelines documenting DEI-related events impacting the private sector, this fifth installment discusses new developments, including new cases and case updates,
On May 21, 2025, in State of Louisiana, et al. v. EEOC, U.S. District Judge David C. Joseph ofthe U.S. District Court for the
New Jersey Appellate Division Finds that State Employer’s Decision to Remove Employee Was Authorized by Statute and Enough to Overcome an Inference of Discrimination
On May 7, 2024, in Savage v. Township of Neptune, the Supreme Court of New Jersey unanimously held that any provision in an employment
On April 17, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, held that to succeed in a Title VII suit
By Julie Alarcón, Esq. As many of you know, New York state and city have laws banning discrimination, including employment discrimination, within their geographic
New Jersey Appellate Court Finds that the Timing of an Employee’s Alleged Whistleblowing Activity Plays a Significant Role in a CEPA Claim By Reema
The long-awaited decision of the New York Appellate Division’s Second Department in Grant v. Global Aircraft Dispatch was entered on January 17, 2024, and
Kerrie R. Heslin, Partner at Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, named to NAMWOLF board CHATHAM, NJ – January 6, 2020 Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC Employment Attorneys
SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.