Update: Following its original decision, the Third Circuit granted a panel rehearing in NRA Group, LLC v. Durenleau et al., vacated its August 26,
Earlier this year, the California Civil Rights Council secured final approval for regulations governing the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and automated-decisions systems (ADS)
New York City employers may soon see their compliance to-do list grow. The New York City Council recently approved a pair of bills to address
UPDATE: The amendments were enacted on October 25, 2025 and will take effect on February 22, 2026. Employers should prepare for compliance ahead of
In our installments of the timeline documenting DEI-related events impacting the private sector, we have been rounding up the latest developments including some public
On August 25, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed that the EEOC may continue investigating and enforcing subpoenas even
On September 5, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) finally put an end to its efforts to defend the agency’s Final Non-Compete Rule –
In the sixth installment of our timelines documenting DEI-related events impacting the private sector, developments reached a feverish pitch as the administration, lawmakers, and
On June 27, 2025, in Trump, et al. v. CASA, Inc., et al., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal district courts likely do not
In April 2024, a Texas federal court blocked the Federal Trade Commission from enforcing its final rule banning new non-compete agreements with nearly all
On April 23, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14281, Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy, which seeks to “eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability
On June 5, 2025, in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services (No. 23-1039), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that “majority group” plaintiffs are not required
A recent case in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania presents an interesting example of how courts are interpreting
On July 1, 2024, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) reform bills AB2288 and SB92 into law, enacting the most significant
Are New Jersey employers legally required to reimburse employees for work-related expenses? While prior New Jersey federal court decisions have been inconsistent on the
Only halfway through 2024, California employers – who are no strangers to change – have already felt the impact of several developments this year,
New Jersey Appellate Division Finds that State Employer’s Decision to Remove Employee Was Authorized by Statute and Enough to Overcome an Inference of Discrimination
On May 7, 2024, in Savage v. Township of Neptune, the Supreme Court of New Jersey unanimously held that any provision in an employment
SAN DIEGO (August 29, 2024): Employment law firm Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (NFC) is proud to welcome attorney Natalie P. Bryans to the firm’s
SAN DIEGO (July 8, 2024): Employment law firm Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (NFC) is proud to welcome attorney Ali Hmoud to the firm’s West
Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C., acknowledged as a leading management side employment law firm in both the NY/NJ and Southern California metropolitan markets, has been
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACTChris Sisco (she/her/hers)Director of Marketing & Business Development Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C. (973) 507-7638CSisco@nfclegal.com Eric W. Hughes (he/him/his)Bershad Director of CommunicationsVolunteer
SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.
