On June 5, 2025, in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services (No. 23-1039), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that “majority group” plaintiffs are not required
Following up on our timelines documenting DEI-related events impacting the private sector, this fifth installment discusses new developments, including new cases and case updates,
On May 21, 2025, in State of Louisiana, et al. v. EEOC, U.S. District Judge David C. Joseph ofthe U.S. District Court for the
Possibly. On March 25, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a decision in Tudor v. Whitehall Central School District
On May 15, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued an order vacating portions of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
On May 1, 2025, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a field assistance bulletin announcing it will no longer apply the 2024 Biden-era
On March 19, 2025, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued two technical assistance documents providing guidance on unlawful discrimination related to diversity,
UPDATE: In a March 18 letter addressed to EEOC Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, seven former EEOC officials urged Lucas to withdraw the 20 letters
On February 26, 2025, in Parra Rodriguez v. Packers Sanitation Services Ltd., LLC, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District held that trial courts
On March 14, 2025, in National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education, et al. v. Trump, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
UPDATE: On March 14, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted the government’s motion to stay the preliminary injunction issued
EDIT: Disclosure requirements under Massachusetts’ pay transparency law will take effect on October 29, 2025. Notwithstanding the revised effective date, disclosure and reporting obligations
By Allison J. Vogel, Esq. The New Jersey Appellate Division recently issued an opinion confirming that the Ending Forced Arbitration Act (EFAA) does not
By Punam P. Alam, Esq. On November 10, 2022, the Second Circuit affirmed the District Court for the Southern District Court of New York’s
By Carol Shieh, Esq. California Code of Civil Procedures section 1281.97 states that if an arbitration agreement requires the drafting party to pay certain
By Jean Schroll Knapp, Esq. In the most recent New Jersey case addressing the interplay between the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”) and
By Kristine V. Ryan, Esq. The Third Circuit recently affirmed a District Court’s preliminary injunction preventing a public employer from enforcing its policy against
By Kirsten McCaw Grossman As competition for labor heats up, we have seen an uptick in the number of restrictive covenant enforcement actions, as
co-authored by Christine Gottesman, Esq., Special Counsel at Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, P.C. in Chatham and Kelly Deere, Assistant Clinical Professor of Law at Rutgers
Employer Arbitration Agreement Pointers From 2 Rulings By Kirsten Grossman (October 13, 2020) published as a Guest Article by Law360 Expert Analysis On Sept.
CHATHAM, NJ (October 1, 2020) – Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (NFC), a top-ranked Employment Law Firm representing management, announced today their expansion to the
RETIREMENT PLAN ERISA FIDUCIARY DUTIES DURING THE COVID-19 CRISIS By: Christine Gottesman, Esq. This article appeared on https://westminster-consulting.com/Media/Confero/Issue31/ on July 14, 2020. Link to
By Kerrie R. Heslin, Esq., Ryan S. Carlson, Esq., and Robin H. Rome, Esq., Nukk-Freeman & Cerra P.C. This article appeared on the Westlaw
CHATHAM, NJ – June 15, 2020 – Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (NFC), a top-ranked Employment Law Firm representing management, is pleased to announce that
SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.