In April 2024, a Texas federal court blocked the Federal Trade Commission from enforcing its final rule banning new non-compete agreements with nearly all
On April 23, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14281, Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy, which seeks to “eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability
The recent unpublished decision in Laposta v. John F. Kennedy Medical Center confirms employers obligations under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“NJLAD”), N.J.S.A.
On June 5, 2025, in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services (No. 23-1039), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that “majority group” plaintiffs are not required
Following up on our timelines documenting DEI-related events impacting the private sector, this fifth installment discusses new developments, including new cases and case updates,
On May 21, 2025, in State of Louisiana, et al. v. EEOC, U.S. District Judge David C. Joseph ofthe U.S. District Court for the
While it’s still early in the legislative session, employers may want to get a head start on reviewing the avalanche of employment-related bills introduced
If you’ve been tracking DEI-related events in the private sector, you know a lot has happened since we first published our timeline on March
If you haven’t updated your employment contracts and settlement agreements in light of the New Jersey Supreme Court’s May 2024 Savage v. Township of Neptune decision,
On March 27, 2025, in Chicago Women in Trades v. Trump et al., U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Kennelly of the U.S. District Court for
As the anniversary of California’s workplace violence prevention law approaches, so too does the deadline to comply with the law’s annual policy review and training requirements. As
UPDATE: On March 27, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (Addressing Risks from WilmerHale) accusing the firm of “abandon[ing] the profession’s highest ideals
California employers have more drama when it comes to PAGA – California’s Private Attorneys General Act. On Monday, July 17, 2023, the California Supreme
By Kegan Andeskie, Esq. In January 2023, Assemblywoman Nily Rozic (D WF-Fresh Meadows) introduced bill NYS S3255 to the New York State Assembly that
By Shirley Castillo, Legal Intern In its recent decision, Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 600 U.S. (2023), the United States Supreme Court held
By Melanie M. Ghaw, Esq. A recent decision by the United States Supreme Court resolved a long-standing circuit split on the issue of whether
By Erica M. Clifford, Esq. The recently established Third Circuit precedent barring out-of-state plaintiffs from joining a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards
By Alison Vogel, Esq. In a matter of first impression, the Third Circuit recently affirmed the New Jersey District Court’s ruling that Uber drivers
As a 100% women-owned firm and champion of DEI in the workplace and beyond, we are saddened by the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs
CHATHAM, NEW JERSEY – March 17, 2022 Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (NFC), a top-ranked Employment Law Firm representing management, is pleased to announce that
In keeping with this year’s theme, “Gender Equality Today for a Sustainable Tomorrow”, NFC salutes the inexhaustible power of women globally.
SAN DIEGO, CA – Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (NFC), a top-ranked Employment Law Firm representing management, is pleased to welcome both Ben Brown Jakovljevic
In the words of Justice Ruth Ginsburg, “It’s so important for little girls to see women on the Supreme Court—it’s natural and proper.” At
During this year’s Black History Month, NFC pays tribute to the critical roles that African Americans have played in building and shaping a more
SIGN UP NOW to receive time sensitive employment law alerts and invitations to complimentary informational webinars and seminars.
"*" indicates required fields
By clicking this button and submitting information to us, you will be submitting certain personally identifiable information, or information which used together with other information, can be used to identify you and/or identify information about you, to Nukk-Freeman & Cerra, PC (“NFC”). Such information may be used by NFC to contact or identify you. Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to, your [name, phone number, address and/or] email address. We collect this information for the purpose of providing services, identifying and communicating with you, responding to your requests/inquiries, and improving our services. We may use your personally identifiable Information to contact you with time sensitive employment law e-alerts, marketing or promotional offers, invitations to complimentary and informational webinars and seminars, and other information that may be of interest to you. However, by providing any of the foregoing information to you, we are not creating an attorney-client relationship between you and NFC: nor are we providing legal advice to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link in any email we send. However, this will not unsubscribe you from receiving future communications from us which are based upon an independent request, relationship or act by you.